This is the eighth of a series of
documents that describe the contents of the PLSS CadNSDI data set.
A Mineral Survey is a type of PLSS Special Survey. In the seventh
document PLSS Special Surveys, (http://nationalcad.blogspot.com/2015/05/plss-cadnsdi-plss-special-surveys-non.html) were discussed in
general. The non-rectangular surveys are deviations from the hierarchical
rectangular surveys, are often defined or guided by provisions of legislation
or authorities. PLSS Special Surveys can
“sit on top” of rectangular surveys or they may replace the rectangular
surveys, creating a “hole” in the rectangular surveys. In some cases a nominal rectangular survey is
extended through the special surveys.
Mineral Surveys
Mineral surveys are made to mark the legal boundaries of
mineral deposits or ore-bearing formations on the public domain where the
boundaries are determined by lines other than the normal subdivision of the
public lands. These surveys include the usual surveying technical procedures
and the examination and documentation of various reports and certificates
necessary to substantiate legal procedures. (http://www.blm.gov/cadastral/minprocedures/mineralguide.htm#)
The manual cited above and several other mineral survey guides are
available on line. This discussion does
not cover the survey, recording, or researching procedures. This document describes how mineral surveys
are portrayed in the PLSS CadNSDI and some of the nuances of using this special
survey type in the PLSS CadNSDI.
Brief
Background
The mineral survey plat and survey notes
are sued to compile the polygons seen in the PLSS CadNSDI. Mineral Surveys were created and recorded to
establish a right of entry to extract or process a mineral deposit. Most mineral surveys are composed of a set of
mining claims (claims). These can be
lode claims, placer claims or mile site claims.
The mineral survey is collection of these claims recorded together, but
the rights and patents (conveyances out of the federal government to the
claimant) occur at the claim level, not the mineral survey level.
Much like a traditional subdivision has
individual lots, a mineral survey has claims, a division of the mineral survey,
and the operational unit is the claim within the survey.
The General land Office (GLO) or BLM
assigns numbers to the mineral surveys. Historically,
they are uniquely numbered within a mining district and more recently most
states have renumbered the mineral surveys providing a unique mineral survey
number within the state. Colorado is the
exception and there are duplicated mineral surveys within the state.
The claims within the mineral survey are
named or numbered. The claim name or
number can be added to records captured in the parcel fabric and over time it
is expected that more of this information will be included in the PLSS
CadNSDI. In some PLSS CadNSDI data sets
the claim lines are included the PLSS Intersected feature class, however, for
legal uses, users should consult the original records or the state BLM Office.
Figure 1 Sample Mineral Survey Plat with Claims |
Accompanying the mineral survey plat is
the Mineral Surveyor’s notes, shown in Figure 2. These
contain detail on the metes and bounds measurements of the individual lodes,
notes on overlapping claims, exceptions, and conflicts. This level of detail describing the rights,
conflicts, and patent status are not part of the cadastral Framework but may be
found on BLM Master Title Plats (MTPs) or Land Status records that describe and
portray federal interests in land.
Figure 2 - Example Mineral Survey Notes |
Some mineral surveys may be segregated
from the rectangular survey with lotting.
Supplemental Survey Plats or occasionally GLO re-lotting plats establish
the segregation lots. Because of the
irregularity of the mineral surveys and the patent issues based on claims
within the mineral surveys and lots established around the mineral surveys, it
is not uncommon to find small slivers of land between mineral surveys that have
not been lotted and have not been patented.
Mineral
Surveys in the PLSS CadNSDI Special Surveys
In many of the highly complicated
mineralized areas, the BLM has not completed the mineral survey abstraction and
verification. In these areas the PLSS
CadNSDI may contain stacked aliquot parts, typically the sixteenth (quarter
quarter) that represent the general location of the mineral survey. These aliquot part polygons are NOT the
mineral survey boundary. These polygons
serve as a general location of the mineral survey. In these cases each mineral survey will
include the sixteenth part the mineral survey is presumed to be in, so some may
be contained entirely within one sixteenth and others may be multiple sixteenth
parts.
The small gaps in and around mineral
surveys may be identified as unnumbered lots or more correctly as remainder
aliquot parts in the PLSS CadNSDI. The
PLSS CadNSDI does not establish the ownership of these gaps. A field survey is
necessary to resolve the exact location and size of these gaps and a records
search (records verification) is necessary to establish the ownership. The PLSS CadNSDI shows the mapping
differences based on record abstracts.
In the PLSS CadNSDI the rectangular PLSS
polygons may be included “under” the Mineral survey areas. A more extensive records search and even a
field survey may be needed to determine of the rectangular PLSS has been
vacated with the additional of the mineral survey. In some states the rectangular PLSS is
included for general location for records indexing and in other states the
rectangular has been removed and the mineral surveys create a “hole” in the
rectangular PLSS.
Because of the nature of mining claims
and mineral discovery, mineral claims and mineral surveys may be located in
unsurveyed protracted areas of the rectangular PLSS. That is the mineral survey was done before
the rectangular survey and there is no supporting rectangular division to
reference the mineral survey. The rectangular polygons in these areas should be
treated as planned areas and should not be relied on for legal land
description. The location of the mineral
survey in relation to the protracted areas should not be relied upon.
Figure 3 is
an example of mineral survey that has been segregated from the rectangular PLSS
and all of the claims in the mineral survey have been patented.
Figure 3 - Example of Segregated Patented Mineral Survey |
Figure 4 is
a mineralized in Utah where some of the mineral surveys have been abstracted
and others have not.
Figure 4 - Example of Rectangular Areas Around Mineral Surveys |
In this case
the rectangular PLSS is provided in areas where the mineral survey has not been
abstracted and has been removed under the mineral survey that has been
abstracted. The segregation lots have been identified around the mineral
survey.
In Figure 5
the PLSS Special Survey class has been added to the map. The mineral survey labeling indicates that
the unabstracted surveys have been assigned to their associated sixteenth or
aliquot second division polygon and the exact outline of the mineral survey
cannot be discerned in the PLSS CadNSDI. For example in Figure 5, notice that
MS142, MS 5582 and MS 5581 have been “mapped” to the NENE aliquot part and MS
6188 is “mapped” to Lot 31.
Figure 5 - Example of Mineral Surveys and Rectangular Areas |
Some References
There are
many Internet published references for mineral survey procedures and the
nuances and details for abstracting and research mineral survey records. The following is a small sample of some
resources.
Mineral Surveys Procedures Guide (http://www.blm.gov/cadastral/minprocedures/mineralguide.htm#)
This is a good guide on the field
survey and reporting requirements and methods.
Searching for BLM Records (http://www.nv.blm.gov/LandRecords/help.html)
This is a web page hosted by the
Nevada BLM State Office that provides some guidance on how to search for
federal land records
2009 Manual of Surveying Instruction (http://www.cfeds.org/docs/sml/ManualOfSurveyingInstructions2009_060414.pdf)
Chapter 10 of the most recent version
of the Manual of Surveying Instruction discusses the elements and surveying requirements
for mineral surveys.
No comments:
Post a Comment